this is a page for

Browsing Tag: Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III

Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III, One Last Time (We Hope).

November 2018.

     After the 2018 midterm elections, President Good People on Both Sides took not days but just hours to send Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III back to Alabama.  The dream was had ended for Mr. Sessions.  It was a pleasure to see him depart; however, concern arose that his exile from the Trump archipelago represented the initiation of a purge that would endanger the Special Counsel’s investigation.  The axing of the Gollum of the South and the elevation of the sycophantic Matt Whitaker to acting attorney general led Indivisible and other activists to stage protests across the country to demand that Robert Mueller be kept in place; I attended one in front of Richmond’s federal building.  I sent a letter to The Washington Post in response to its reporting of Mr. Session’s banishment.

Here’s the article by Devlin Barrett, Matt Zapotosky, and Josh Dawsey:

Devlin Barrett, Matt Zapotosky, and Josh Dawsey, “Trump Forces Sessions Out as Attorney General,” The Washington Post, 8 November 2018, A1, A10 (www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/attorney-general-jeff-sessions-resigns-at-trumps-request/2018/11/07/d1b7a214-e144-11e8-ab2c-b31dcd53ca6b_story.html).

Here’s the letter:

“Exit Mr. Sessions, Enter Chaos,” The Washington Post, 11 November 2018, A26 (www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/jeff-sessions-exits-chaos-enters/2018/11/09/27e2351e-e38e-11e8-ba30-a7ded04d8fac_story.html). (Scroll down).

Sweet Home Alabama.

August 2017.

     Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III was the gift that kept on giving, until he didn’t.  His elevation to Generalissimo El Trumpo’s – apologies to Ted Rall – cabinet left his Senate seat open.  The GOP primary to fill it was a freak show.  Yet, it was more than a freak show.  It was a syllabus of the Republican Party’s vices and the race grew more perverse as it proceeded.  The revelation of “Judge” Roy Moore’s alleged high regard for young, delightfully young, women came later.  On the plus side, the GOP tomfoolery opened the lane for Doug Jones to secure the seat, a good, albeit temporary, outcome.  The Washington Post passed on this missive too.  I can’t image why, he mutters to himself once again ironically.

Here’s Robert Costa’s article:

Robert Costa, “Trump’s Fraying Relationship with GOP Colors Ala. Special Election,” The Washington Post, 14 August 2017, A1, A4 (www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/trumps-feuding-base-faces-showdown-in-alabama-senate-race/2017/08/13/b37a6f24-7ed6-11e7-83c7-5bd5460f0d7e_story.html).

Here’s the unpublished letter:

     Perhaps the special election for the US Senate seat in Alabama would be a sadly amusing farce were it not an image in microcosm of the maladies besetting the GOP:  a religious bigot and homophobe (former Alabama Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore) vies with a Tea Party zealot (US Congressman Mo Brooks) to unseat a hard-right apparatchik (US Senator Luther Strange) installed by a rank family-values hypocrite (former Alabama Governor Robert Bentley) to serve in place of an unqualified and ethically compromised US Attorney General (Jefferson Beauregard Sessions) who may have perjured himself in his confirmation hearing, each candidate kowtowing to Mr. Trump for his endorsement, each candidate posturing as more Trumpian than Trump.  This reality is made sadder by the probability that the Republican Party primary may as well be the election itself in deep red Alabama.  With candidates and a political culture such as these, how can President Obama’s forlorn wish for the breaking of the GOP’s “fever” ever be realized?

I Love This Effing Job Because This Job Loves Effing Me.

July 2017.

Nothing appeals more than spewing invective into the vicinity of Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III.  In a rational world, Mr. Sessions would never have been confirmed as attorney general.  He is the same man who couldn’t pass muster for a federal judgeship in 1986 because of his bigotry.  Was it to be supposed that he grew more tolerant in the interim?  Anyway, he had the brass ring in a death grip and it would have to be prized from his fingers.  It may have been just as well that he remained in place for a while if it ensured that the country would endure less of William Barr or someone worse.  Mr. Sessions is a mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging doofus.  William Barr is competently malevolent.  There remains little sport in lambasting Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III.  It’s the rhetorical equivalent of shooting catfish in a barrel.  The Washington Post passed on this response to its news reporting.  I can’t imagine why, he says to himself ironically.

Here’s the article by Robert Costa, Sari Horwitz and Matt Zapotosky:

Robert Costa, Sari Horwitz, and Matt Zapotosky, “Jeff Sessions Says He Plans to Stay in Role, Despite Trump’s Comments about Him,” The Washington Post, 20 July 2017 (www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/attorney-general-jeff-sessions-says-he-plans-to-stay-in-role-despite-trumps-comments-about-him/2017/07/20/527e53d4-6d51-11e7-9c15-177740635e83_story.html).

Here’s the unpublished letter:

Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III’s determination to remain U. S. Attorney General is unfortunate.  Mr. Sessions’ antediluvian attitude toward voting rights, his antipathy toward immigrants, and his resolve to resuscitate a failed war on drugs should have disqualified him from the office.  He has blemished the position by enabling Mr. Trump’s basest, most autocratic impulses.  His lone unsordid act – recusal from the investigation of Russian meddling in the 2016 election – was not motivated by principle but by backlash against his dissembling under oath.

     In the face of Mr. Trump’s recent and somewhat bizarre criticism of him, integrity demands that Mr. Sessions resign.  Nothing indeed would so become Mr. Sessions in his time as Attorney General as his leaving of it, if he can muster sufficient principle to use his departure to make a statement:  the Attorney General serves at the President’s will but is not and cannot be the chief executive’s lackey.

Will No One Rid Me of This Turbulent. . .

May 2017.

     This is another failed response to a news story, in this instance what historians will likely view as a milestone of the Trump regime, the sacking of FBI Director James Comey.  The axing of Mr. Comey, for whom I have no great regard, is wedded in memory with a personal event.  The news broke while I was killing time in a waiting room as My Beloved was undergoing laparoscopy on a knee.  During her convalescence, the wall-to-wall cable news coverage of the Comey dismissal was our principal diversion.

     The event afforded me another opportunity to take a swipe at the appalling Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III.  By acceding to the Mr. Comey’s banishment, the attorney general undid his lone virtuous act, his honoring of the Office of Legal Counsel’s advice to recuse himself from oversight of the Department of Justice’s probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 election.  It seemed clear that canning the FBI director was intended to hobble the investigation by other means.  It was becoming evident by this juncture that neither competence nor honesty nor respect for rule of law would be the métier of Trumpian governance.

     The unpublished letter is a standard response to the situation.  It does contain a misstep in form, an allusion to another letter that had been published.  No one cares about that; however, it indicates how exercised I was by Mr. Sessions’ tenure as attorney general.

Here’s Ellen Nakashima and Matt Zapotosky’s article:

Ellen Nakashima and Matt Zapotosky, “Trump Fires FBI Director,” The Washington Post, 10 May 2017, A1, A4 (www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/comeys-removal-sparks-fears-about-future-of-russia-probe/2017/05/09/013d9ade-3507-11e7-b412-62beef8121f7_story.html).

Here’s the unpublished letter:

     My recent letter (“Mr. McCain’s Words and Actions,” Washington Post, February 2, 2017) implored Senator John McCain to match his fair criticism of President Trump with action by voting against the most troubling of the president’s cabinet nominees, among them former Senator Jeff Sessions.

     Attorney General Sessions’ involvement in the dismissal of FBI Director James Comey – notwithstanding Mr. Session’s recusal of himself from the FBI’s examination of Russian meddling in the 2016 election – exposes the danger inherent in acceding to an unqualified, temperamentally unsuitable, and potentially compromised nominee.

     It is imperative that Republicans resist Mr. Trump’s baldly transparent effort to hamstring the FBI probe and stand with Democrats in calling for a special prosecutor to investigate potential links between the Trump campaign and Russia.  Statesmanship and defense of the constitutional system must outweigh partisanship and the Senate must defend the government’s balance of power against a disingenuous and unscrupulous chief executive.  Senator McCain and his Republican senatorial colleagues can perform signal service to the nation by joining with their Democratic counterparts.

The Attorney General Went Down to Richmond. . .

March 2017.

     I am fond of The Richmond Free Press.  Free weeklies give a city character and The Richmond Free Press is a quality weekly.  Even better, it has a crusading spirit.  It suffers no confusion about its mission or its readership.  It doesn’t engage in journalistic triangulation.  It also presents a vital counterpoint to Richmond’s daily print outlet.  Now that the coronavirus is ebbing, I’m looking forward to pulling a pulp copy from the box every week.  The paper has a good letters policy; it accepts more lengthy screeds.

     In March 2017, Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III slithered from the Potomac to the James to address a law-enforcement crowd.  What is there to say about the man, other than that he’s a Trumpian sack of trash?  Rarely has a cabinet official been more ill-suited for the position or for the moment.  Integrity was evinced during his tenure by a lone, solitary act that was in fact a promise not to act; there will be more about that later.  Mr. Sessions’ speech in Richmond was a signaling of nefarious intent, a probable expansion of the prison industrial complex by resurrecting practices likely to target Blacks and the poor disproportionately.  Somehow it slipped his mind to invite The Richmond Free Press, the outlet most likely to speak to these communities.  I do declare, how ever could that have happened?

Here’s the article:

Free Press Staff, wire reports, “Sessions Seeks to Revive Federal Anti-Crime Program that Targeted African-Americans,” The Richmond Free Press, 16-18 March 2017, A1, A4 (http://richmondfreepress.com/news/2017/mar/17/sessions-seeks-revive-federal-anti-crime-program-t/).

Here’s the letter:

“Exclusion ‘Appalling but Unsurprising,’” The Richmond Free Press, 23-25 March 2017, A7 (http://richmondfreepress.com/news/2017/mar/24/exclusion-appalling-unsurprising/).

Why the Bourbon Progressive?

April 2021.

This existential question begs to be the first matter addressed on this blog because, by all rights, this blog should not exist.  I’ve been called a Luddite and that’s fair enough, if the charge targets my insistence that neither the laptop nor the cyber realm become master rather than servant.  My low regard for social media is the corollary to this.

     A decade or so ago, My Better Half and I shared a pleasant lunch with a pair of marketing consultants at Facebook who were ultimately hired by the tech behemoth and prospered there.  They made the case for our opening accounts by emphasizing the value of “connection.”  I told them that the project struck me as narcissistic.  They were taken aback and offered no good riposte.  This “connection” they lauded seemed to me ersatz, cold, sterile, quasi-anonymous.  My assessment of the medium has not wavered in the interim.  I have never been on MySpace, let alone Facebook or Twitter, and suffer no feeling of deprivation.  Blogging, likewise, has held no allure for me.  The master-servant thing makes the compulsion to post materials frequently a dire prospect to contemplate.  So, I’m a reluctant, nearly accidental blogger.

     What changed my mind?  The country’s disconcerting, disquieting, disorienting politics has much to do with it.  To whatever degree someone whose formative years were passed in the Bluegrass can be considered Southern, I’m a Southerner whose political leanings tend toward progressive populism.  For me, as for many, the ascent of the Orange One to the White House in 2016 was a watershed.  His term in office, if nothing else, was clarifying.  The rot in the American political system, already evident to any thinking person, was made manifest for anyone caring to look.  One of its political parties has descended into an intellectual void, its leadership bordering on collective sociopathy, its contempt for one-person, one-vote democracy undeniable and even flaunted, and its raison d’être stripped to bald retention of power.  Then there is the other party.  It long ago lost its way.  It strayed from its roots and compromised its values.  It forgot whose interests it was supposed to serve.  It became paralyzingly feckless, fearful of its own shadow.  His Orangeness’s reign revealed just how long overdue is the day of reckoning for the neoliberal consensus that has shaped American political life for a half century and has benefited the few while immiserating the many.

     With The New and Now Former Occupant came the deluge:  trampling of democratic norms, bullhorn bigotry, open and seemingly joyful corruption, brazen nepotism, clownish authoritarianism.  Like many, I was “activated,” determined to do my small part, whatever was within my scope, to push back against the depredations of the Trump regime.  I attended marches and protests, such as the Tax March in Washington, DC, in April 2017; a counterprotest here in Richmond in September 2017 when the “New Confederate States of America,” a sad, ragtag band of neo-Confederates, made an appearance at the Robert E. Lee statue on Monument Avenue and just as quickly cravenly decamped; a protest in Richmond’s Capitol Square in June 2018 against The Xenophobe-in-Chief’s immigration atrocities; or a rally in front of the Richmond’s federal courthouse in November 2018 to demand the continuation of the Mueller investigation after the jettisoning of the vile Jefferson Beauregard Sessions III.  Had I accepted an invitation from the Richmond Peace Education Center to jump on the bus, I would have been in Charlottesville in August 2017 when Heather Heyer was murdered by a neo-Nazi loon.  And I began to write letters to the editors of some newspapers and magazines and put together a handful of opinion pieces.

     When these odds and ends began to reach print, The Better Half commenced a full-court press for me to start a blog.  She has always been my unquestioning and unflagging supporter – the exaggerator of my virtues and the minimizer of my defects.  She has also been my self-appointed publicist and forwards whatever I write to friends and acquaintances.  She claimed from the outset that people wanted to read this stuff; I had and still have doubts about this.  The rationale for my deafness to her pleas was that blogging would be tantamount to preaching to the choir, that the readers would be people predisposed to agree with me.  The only reason to write was to reach those who disagreed.  Print newspapers and magazines were the best media for this.

     Then She Who Must Be Obeyed – thanks Rumpole – made a compelling argument.  She reminded me about my submissions that never saw the light of day.  Truth be told, some of these “misses” are more interesting than the “hits.”  A blog can be a place for any genuinely interested people to have a look at them, a repository, an archive.  For someone by nature and education archivally minded, this has an appeal.  I also discovered that creating a blog is neither difficult nor expensive.  So, Joanna darlin’, you wore me down.  You win on this one and, whatever becomes of it, it is largely for you.

July 2021.

     A season has passed since my original drafting of the remarks above.  In the interim – in the interstices scattered through the requirements of quotidian existence – letters to the editor and old essays were resurrected from the bowels of my laptop, introductions were written, photos and images were scavenged, and blogposts were assembled.  During this final week of July, the website will be coming to life and initially will contain more than seventy posts, a small mountain of content.  This is probably not how these things typically begin, though I’m no aficionado of the form and am happy to be corrected on this.

     As the blog – ugh, what a wretched neologism – is becoming public, the pangs of hypocrisy I’m feeling are perhaps unavoidable.  The finished product seems narcissistic and it’s fair to ask how deeply I’ve become mired in the navel-gazing tarpit that is cyber realm.  Then again, how could the endeavor not assume narcissistic contours when the task was to revisit, organize, and comment upon what I’ve thought and written about over the past few years?  Be that as it may, the project was a spur to introspection, so it couldn’t have been devoid of value.  Whatever the case, it’s time to push the launch button.

A Word Regarding Copyright and Paywalls.

     Reluctant to offend the gods of copyright, I haven’t included the texts of letters and essays that were published and instead have given links for their online versions.  Some items may be hidden behind paywalls, though most should be accessible.  Since I’m bibliographically minded, full library citation has been included for the locations of letters and editorials that have appeared on the printed page.