Let the Rationalizations Roll.

December 2016.

     And then there was a second whiff with the Grey Lady.

     I enjoy reading Paul Krugman’s columns.  His consistent, reasoned, and informed assault on supply-side economics and his extolling of the virtues of rational deficit spending are valuable.  There’s joy to be found in Mr. Krugman’s capacity to inflict agita on conservative economists; moreover, the clarity of his exposition is admirable.

     This being said, his explanation for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s loss to Queens’ Least Favorite Son was wide of the mark.  Sensible people in late 2016 struggled to cope with the discombobulating event.  Mr. Krugman unfortunately gravitated toward a simplistic explanation I had heard from others, that it all should be placed at the feet of Russian skullduggery and the media’s mishandling of the story.  Mr. Krugman opted for proximate causation – the isolation of a single factor at the terminus of a lengthy string of causation – as the culprit rather than wading into the debacle’s complexities.

     The elegant simplicity of a proximate explanation is appealing.  It banishes from consideration the myriad of factors that undid Ms. Clinton’s campaign, namely the Mt. Everest of political baggage she and her husband have accumulated, the narrowing of her potential electorate by decades of right-wing demonization of her, her mediocre skills and flawed instincts as a candidate (she’s not her husband, whatever one may think of him), and her campaign’s strategic and tactical blunders.

     The centering of a proximate explanation has perhaps another advantage:  It leaves a weltanschauung intact, unquestioned, unexamined.  The subtext of the election for me was the corrosive effects of the neoliberal consensus, four decades of misguided policies to which the Clintons had materially contributed.

     Nonetheless, I still enjoy reading Paul Krugman’s columns.  A second rebuff from the Grey Lady didn’t discourage me.

Here’s Paul Krugman’s column:

Paul Krugman, “Useful Idiots Galore,” The New York Times, 16 December 2016, A31 (https://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/16/opinion/useful-idiots-galore.html).

Here’s the unpublished letter:

Paul Krugman accurately characterizes the GOP’s hypocritical silence in the face of Russian hacking and the media’s often uncritical handling of Russian cyber skullduggery and Ms. Clinton’s emails.  He, however, has anointed himself chief apologist for a flawed candidate and an inept campaign.  Before engaging in shotgun name-calling, he should ponder how, with a noxious, patently unqualified GOP opponent, the election was so close that hacks or media missteps mattered.  Ms. Clinton wrested defeat from the jaws of victory.

About The Author

The Bourbon Progressive

A son of the Bluegrass, the Bourbon Progressive has lived in Richmond, Virginia, since the summer of 2001.